Ohlson 8.8 vs Thames Marine Mirage 29
How do the Ohlson 8.8 and Thames Marine Mirage 29 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Ohlson 8.8 | Ohlson 8.8 | Thames Marine Mirage 29 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.9 ft8.80 m | 28.8 ft8.79 m |
| Waterline length | 23.9 ft7.30 m | 25.3 ft7.70 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.85 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 5.6 ft1.72 m | 3.8 ft1.14 m |
| Displacement | 7,937 lb3,600 kg | 8,267 lb3,750 kg |
| Ballast | 2,646 lb1,200 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 355 ft²33.0 m² | 353 ft²32.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.28 | 13.81 |
| Displacement / Length | 258 | 229 |
| Comfort ratio | 24.6 | 21.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.87 | 2.08 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Average used price | €7,900 | — |
Ohlson 8.8 vs Thames Marine Mirage 29: the short version
- The Ohlson 8.8 and Thames Marine Mirage 29 are close in length (28.9 ft8.80 m vs 28.8 ft8.79 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Ohlson 8.8 carries the more powerful rig (14.3 vs 13.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ohlson 8.8 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ohlson 8.8 rates better for offshore work (1.87 vs 2.08).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.