Open Fun 3,7 vs Widgeon 12
How do the Open Fun 3,7 and Widgeon 12 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Open Fun 3,7 | Open Fun 3,7 | Widgeon 12 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.3 ft3.75 m | 12.3 ft3.76 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 12.0 ft3.66 m |
| Beam | 2.2 ft0.68 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Draft | —— | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 44 lb20 kg | 180 lb82 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | 90 ft²8.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 45.17 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 47 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 2.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.53 | 3.54 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 4.6 |
Open Fun 3,7 vs Widgeon 12: the short version
- The Open Fun 3,7 and Widgeon 12 are close in length (12.3 ft3.75 m vs 12.3 ft3.76 m ).
- The Widgeon 12 is heavier, displacing about 309% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Open Fun 3,7 rates better for offshore work (2.53 vs 3.54).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.