Paceship 20 vs Paceship PY 26
How do the Paceship 20 and Paceship PY 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Paceship 20 
Paceship PY 26 | Paceship 20 | Paceship PY 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.3 ft5.87 m | 26.3 ft8.03 m |
| Waterline length | 17.2 ft5.24 m | 22.5 ft6.86 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 9.5 ft2.90 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 800 lb363 kg | 6,000 lb2,722 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 2,200 lb998 kg |
| Sail area | 155 ft²14.4 m² | 339 ft²31.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 28.78 | 16.43 |
| Displacement / Length | 70 | 235 |
| Comfort ratio | 4.5 | 19.5 |
| Capsize screening | 3.34 | 2.09 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 6.4 |
Paceship 20 vs Paceship PY 26: the short version
- The Paceship PY 26 is the larger boat at 26.3 ft8.03 m LOA versus 19.3 ft5.87 m for the Paceship 20.
- The Paceship PY 26 is heavier, displacing about 650% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Paceship 20 carries the more powerful rig (28.8 vs 16.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Paceship PY 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Paceship PY 26 rates better for offshore work (2.09 vs 3.34).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.