Paceship 20 vs Rhodes 19
How do the Paceship 20 and Rhodes 19 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Paceship 20 
Rhodes 19 | Paceship 20 | Rhodes 19 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.3 ft5.87 m | 19.2 ft5.84 m |
| Waterline length | 17.2 ft5.24 m | 17.8 ft5.41 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 7.0 ft2.13 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | 3.3 ft0.99 m |
| Displacement | 800 lb363 kg | 1,325 lb601 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 428 lb194 kg |
| Sail area | 155 ft²14.4 m² | 167 ft²15.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 28.78 | 22.15 |
| Displacement / Length | 70 | 106 |
| Comfort ratio | 4.5 | 8.4 |
| Capsize screening | 3.34 | 2.55 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 5.6 |
Paceship 20 vs Rhodes 19: the short version
- The Paceship 20 and Rhodes 19 are close in length (19.3 ft5.87 m vs 19.2 ft5.84 m ).
- The Rhodes 19 is heavier, displacing about 66% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Paceship 20 carries the more powerful rig (28.8 vs 22.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Rhodes 19 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Rhodes 19 rates better for offshore work (2.55 vs 3.34).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.