Pearson 26 vs Pearson Triton
How do the Pearson 26 and Pearson Triton compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Pearson 26 
Pearson Triton | Pearson 26 | Pearson Triton | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.2 ft7.98 m | 28.3 ft8.63 m |
| Waterline length | 21.7 ft6.61 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Beam | 8.7 ft2.64 m | 8.3 ft2.51 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 3.9 ft1.19 m |
| Displacement | 5,400 lb2,449 kg | 6,930 lb3,143 kg |
| Ballast | 2,200 lb998 kg | 3,019 lb1,369 kg |
| Sail area | 322 ft²29.9 m² | 371 ft²34.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.74 | 16.33 |
| Displacement / Length | 237 | 311 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.4 | 27.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.98 | 1.73 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.2 |
Pearson 26 vs Pearson Triton: the short version
- The Pearson Triton is the larger boat at 28.3 ft8.63 m LOA versus 26.2 ft7.98 m for the Pearson 26.
- The Pearson Triton is heavier, displacing about 28% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Pearson 26 carries the more powerful rig (16.7 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Pearson Triton scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Pearson Triton rates better for offshore work (1.73 vs 1.98).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.