Pearson 303 vs Pearson Triton
How do the Pearson 303 and Pearson Triton compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Pearson 303 | Pearson 303 | Pearson Triton | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.3 ft9.23 m | 28.3 ft8.63 m |
| Waterline length | 25.4 ft7.73 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Beam | 10.9 ft3.33 m | 8.3 ft2.51 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.32 m | 3.9 ft1.19 m |
| Displacement | 10,100 lb4,581 kg | 6,930 lb3,143 kg |
| Ballast | 3,500 lb1,588 kg | 3,019 lb1,369 kg |
| Sail area | 459 ft²42.6 m² | 371 ft²34.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.72 | 16.33 |
| Displacement / Length | 276 | 311 |
| Comfort ratio | 24.1 | 27.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.02 | 1.73 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.7 | 6.2 |
Pearson 303 vs Pearson Triton: the short version
- The Pearson 303 is the larger boat at 30.3 ft9.23 m LOA versus 28.3 ft8.63 m for the Pearson Triton.
- The Pearson 303 is heavier, displacing about 46% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Pearson Triton carries the more powerful rig (16.3 vs 15.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Pearson Triton scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Pearson Triton rates better for offshore work (1.73 vs 2.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.