Pearson Electra vs Pearson Ensign
How do the Pearson Electra and Pearson Ensign compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Pearson Electra 
Pearson Ensign | Pearson Electra | Pearson Ensign | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.5 ft6.86 m | 22.5 ft6.86 m |
| Waterline length | 16.8 ft5.11 m | 16.8 ft5.11 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 7.0 ft2.13 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 3,000 lb1,361 kg | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Ballast | 1,299 lb589 kg | 1,200 lb544 kg |
| Sail area | 228 ft²21.2 m² | 235 ft²21.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.54 | 18.08 |
| Displacement / Length | 285 | 285 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.8 | 18.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.94 | 1.94 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.5 | 5.5 |
Pearson Electra vs Pearson Ensign: the short version
- The Pearson Electra and Pearson Ensign are close in length (22.5 ft6.86 m vs 22.5 ft6.86 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Pearson Ensign carries the more powerful rig (18.1 vs 17.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Pearson Ensign scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Pearson Ensign rates better for offshore work (1.94 vs 1.94).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.