Pearson Electra vs Pearson Triton
How do the Pearson Electra and Pearson Triton compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Pearson Electra | Pearson Electra | Pearson Triton | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.5 ft6.86 m | 28.3 ft8.63 m |
| Waterline length | 16.8 ft5.11 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 8.3 ft2.51 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | 3.9 ft1.19 m |
| Displacement | 3,000 lb1,361 kg | 6,930 lb3,143 kg |
| Ballast | 1,299 lb589 kg | 3,019 lb1,369 kg |
| Sail area | 228 ft²21.2 m² | 371 ft²34.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.54 | 16.33 |
| Displacement / Length | 285 | 311 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.8 | 27.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.94 | 1.73 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.5 | 6.2 |
Pearson Electra vs Pearson Triton: the short version
- The Pearson Triton is the larger boat at 28.3 ft8.63 m LOA versus 22.5 ft6.86 m for the Pearson Electra.
- The Pearson Triton is heavier, displacing about 131% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Pearson Electra carries the more powerful rig (17.5 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Pearson Triton scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Pearson Triton rates better for offshore work (1.73 vs 1.94).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.