Phantom 14 vs Phantom 16
How do the Phantom 14 and Phantom 16 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Phantom 14 | Phantom 16 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.1 ft4.30 m | 15.9 ft4.85 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 7.2 ft2.20 m | 7.5 ft2.30 m |
| Draft | 1.5 ft0.46 m | 1.5 ft0.46 m |
| Displacement | 198 lb90 kg | 265 lb120 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 107 ft²9.9 m² | 301 ft²28.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 50.40 | 116.73 |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 4.95 | 4.70 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Phantom 14 vs Phantom 16: the short version
- The Phantom 16 is the larger boat at 15.9 ft4.85 m LOA versus 14.1 ft4.30 m for the Phantom 14.
- The Phantom 16 is heavier, displacing about 34% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Phantom 16 carries the more powerful rig (116.7 vs 50.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Phantom 16 rates better for offshore work (4.70 vs 4.95).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.