Phantom 14 vs Rascal 14
How do the Phantom 14 and Rascal 14 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Phantom 14 | Phantom 14 | Rascal 14 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.2 ft4.33 m | 14.4 ft4.40 m |
| Waterline length | 10.5 ft3.20 m | 13.8 ft4.22 m |
| Beam | 4.4 ft1.35 m | 6.0 ft1.83 m |
| Draft | 2.8 ft0.86 m | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 120 lb54 kg | 400 lb181 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 85 ft²7.9 m² | 121 ft²11.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 55.90 | 35.66 |
| Displacement / Length | 46 | 68 |
| Comfort ratio | 2.2 | 4.1 |
| Capsize screening | 3.58 | 3.26 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 4.3 | 5.0 |
Phantom 14 vs Rascal 14: the short version
- The Phantom 14 and Rascal 14 are close in length (14.2 ft4.33 m vs 14.4 ft4.40 m ).
- The Rascal 14 is heavier, displacing about 233% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Phantom 14 carries the more powerful rig (55.9 vs 35.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Rascal 14 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Rascal 14 rates better for offshore work (3.26 vs 3.58).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.