Phantom vs Rascal 14
How do the Phantom and Rascal 14 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Phantom | Phantom | Rascal 14 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.5 ft4.42 m | 14.4 ft4.40 m |
| Waterline length | 13.8 ft4.22 m | 13.8 ft4.22 m |
| Beam | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 6.0 ft1.83 m |
| Draft | 2.8 ft0.85 m | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 134 lb61 kg | 400 lb181 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 105 ft²9.8 m² | 121 ft²11.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 64.16 | 35.66 |
| Displacement / Length | 23 | 68 |
| Comfort ratio | 1.5 | 4.1 |
| Capsize screening | 4.30 | 3.26 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Phantom vs Rascal 14: the short version
- The Phantom and Rascal 14 are close in length (14.5 ft4.42 m vs 14.4 ft4.40 m ).
- The Rascal 14 is heavier, displacing about 199% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Phantom carries the more powerful rig (64.2 vs 35.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Rascal 14 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Rascal 14 rates better for offshore work (3.26 vs 4.30).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.