Phantom vs Skipjack 15
How do the Phantom and Skipjack 15 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Phantom | Phantom | Skipjack 15 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.5 ft4.42 m | 14.6 ft4.44 m |
| Waterline length | 13.8 ft4.22 m | —— |
| Beam | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Draft | 2.8 ft0.85 m | 3.8 ft1.17 m |
| Displacement | 134 lb61 kg | 340 lb154 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 105 ft²9.8 m² | 125 ft²11.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 64.16 | 41.06 |
| Displacement / Length | 23 | — |
| Comfort ratio | 1.5 | — |
| Capsize screening | 4.30 | 3.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.0 | — |
Phantom vs Skipjack 15: the short version
- The Phantom and Skipjack 15 are close in length (14.5 ft4.42 m vs 14.6 ft4.44 m ).
- The Skipjack 15 is heavier, displacing about 154% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Phantom carries the more powerful rig (64.2 vs 41.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Skipjack 15 rates better for offshore work (3.01 vs 4.30).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.