Prospect 900 vs Watkins 29
How do the Prospect 900 and Watkins 29 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Prospect 900 
Watkins 29 | Prospect 900 | Watkins 29 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.8 ft8.79 m | 28.9 ft8.81 m |
| Waterline length | 22.4 ft6.83 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Beam | 9.2 ft2.80 m | 10.3 ft3.15 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.50 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 7,275 lb3,300 kg | 8,800 lb3,992 kg |
| Ballast | 3,086 lb1,400 kg | 3,900 lb1,769 kg |
| Sail area | 291 ft²27.0 m² | 370 ft²34.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 12.40 | 13.89 |
| Displacement / Length | 288 | 284 |
| Comfort ratio | 24.1 | 23.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.89 | 2.00 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.6 |
Prospect 900 vs Watkins 29: the short version
- The Prospect 900 and Watkins 29 are close in length (28.8 ft8.79 m vs 28.9 ft8.81 m ).
- The Watkins 29 is heavier, displacing about 21% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Watkins 29 carries the more powerful rig (13.9 vs 12.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Prospect 900 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Prospect 900 rates better for offshore work (1.89 vs 2.00).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.