Puffer vs Run
How do the Puffer and Run compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Puffer | Puffer | Run | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.5 ft3.81 m | 12.5 ft3.80 m |
| Waterline length | 11.5 ft3.51 m | —— |
| Beam | 4.8 ft1.47 m | 2.2 ft0.67 m |
| Draft | 2.8 ft0.86 m | —— |
| Displacement | 160 lb73 kg | 42 lb19 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 90 ft²8.4 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 48.86 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 47 | — |
| Comfort ratio | 2.6 | — |
| Capsize screening | 3.56 | 2.53 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 4.5 | — |
Puffer vs Run: the short version
- The Puffer and Run are close in length (12.5 ft3.81 m vs 12.5 ft3.80 m ).
- The Puffer is heavier, displacing about 281% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Run rates better for offshore work (2.53 vs 3.56).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.