Ranger 16 vs Ranger 23
How do the Ranger 16 and Ranger 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Ranger 16 | Ranger 16 | Ranger 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 16.7 ft5.08 m | 23.7 ft7.21 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 6.0 ft1.83 m | 7.9 ft2.41 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.90 m | 3.8 ft1.14 m |
| Displacement | 450 lb204 kg | 3,400 lb1,542 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 1,500 lb680 kg |
| Sail area | 154 ft²14.3 m² | 244 ft²22.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 41.96 | 17.27 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 190 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 15.8 |
| Capsize screening | 3.13 | 2.11 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 6.0 |
Ranger 16 vs Ranger 23: the short version
- The Ranger 23 is the larger boat at 23.7 ft7.21 m LOA versus 16.7 ft5.08 m for the Ranger 16.
- The Ranger 23 is heavier, displacing about 656% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Ranger 16 carries the more powerful rig (42.0 vs 17.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ranger 23 rates better for offshore work (2.11 vs 3.13).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.