Ranger 23 vs Ranger 30
How do the Ranger 23 and Ranger 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Ranger 23 | Ranger 23 | Ranger 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.7 ft7.21 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Waterline length | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 25.4 ft7.75 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 10.8 ft3.28 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.14 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 3,400 lb1,542 kg | 10,500 lb4,763 kg |
| Ballast | 1,500 lb680 kg | 4,300 lb1,950 kg |
| Sail area | 244 ft²22.7 m² | 462 ft²42.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.27 | 15.42 |
| Displacement / Length | 190 | 285 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.8 | 25.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.11 | 1.96 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.8 |
Ranger 23 vs Ranger 30: the short version
- The Ranger 30 is the larger boat at 30.0 ft9.14 m LOA versus 23.7 ft7.21 m for the Ranger 23.
- The Ranger 30 is heavier, displacing about 209% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Ranger 23 carries the more powerful rig (17.3 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ranger 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ranger 30 rates better for offshore work (1.96 vs 2.11).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.