Ranger 26 vs Ranger 30
How do the Ranger 26 and Ranger 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Ranger 26 | Ranger 26 | Ranger 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.3 ft8.00 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.63 m | 25.4 ft7.75 m |
| Beam | 8.7 ft2.64 m | 10.8 ft3.28 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.32 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 5,860 lb2,658 kg | 10,500 lb4,763 kg |
| Ballast | 2,050 lb930 kg | 4,300 lb1,950 kg |
| Sail area | 322 ft²29.9 m² | 462 ft²42.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.85 | 15.42 |
| Displacement / Length | 254 | 285 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.1 | 25.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.92 | 1.96 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.8 |
Ranger 26 vs Ranger 30: the short version
- The Ranger 30 is the larger boat at 30.0 ft9.14 m LOA versus 26.3 ft8.00 m for the Ranger 26.
- The Ranger 30 is heavier, displacing about 79% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Ranger 26 carries the more powerful rig (15.9 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ranger 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ranger 26 rates better for offshore work (1.92 vs 1.96).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.