Ranger 26 vs Ranger 37
How do the Ranger 26 and Ranger 37 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Ranger 26 | Ranger 26 | Ranger 37 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.3 ft8.00 m | 37.0 ft11.28 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.63 m | 28.3 ft8.63 m |
| Beam | 8.7 ft2.64 m | 11.3 ft3.45 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.32 m | 6.0 ft1.83 m |
| Displacement | 5,860 lb2,658 kg | 15,200 lb6,895 kg |
| Ballast | 2,050 lb930 kg | 7,300 lb3,311 kg |
| Sail area | 322 ft²29.9 m² | 629 ft²58.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.85 | 16.40 |
| Displacement / Length | 254 | 298 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.1 | 30.0 |
| Capsize screening | 1.92 | 1.83 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 7.1 |
Ranger 26 vs Ranger 37: the short version
- The Ranger 37 is the larger boat at 37.0 ft11.28 m LOA versus 26.3 ft8.00 m for the Ranger 26.
- The Ranger 37 is heavier, displacing about 159% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Ranger 37 carries the more powerful rig (16.4 vs 15.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ranger 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ranger 37 rates better for offshore work (1.83 vs 1.92).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.