Ranger 30 vs Ranger 37
How do the Ranger 30 and Ranger 37 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Ranger 30 | Ranger 30 | Ranger 37 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.0 ft9.14 m | 37.0 ft11.28 m |
| Waterline length | 25.4 ft7.75 m | 28.3 ft8.63 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.28 m | 11.3 ft3.45 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 6.0 ft1.83 m |
| Displacement | 10,500 lb4,763 kg | 15,200 lb6,895 kg |
| Ballast | 4,300 lb1,950 kg | 7,300 lb3,311 kg |
| Sail area | 462 ft²42.9 m² | 629 ft²58.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.42 | 16.40 |
| Displacement / Length | 285 | 298 |
| Comfort ratio | 25.6 | 30.0 |
| Capsize screening | 1.96 | 1.83 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.8 | 7.1 |
Ranger 30 vs Ranger 37: the short version
- The Ranger 37 is the larger boat at 37.0 ft11.28 m LOA versus 30.0 ft9.14 m for the Ranger 30.
- The Ranger 37 is heavier, displacing about 45% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Ranger 37 carries the more powerful rig (16.4 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ranger 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ranger 37 rates better for offshore work (1.83 vs 1.96).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.