Raven vs Seidelmann 245
How do the Raven and Seidelmann 245 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Raven | Raven | Seidelmann 245 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.3 ft7.39 m | 24.2 ft7.37 m |
| Waterline length | 21.6 ft6.58 m | 20.5 ft6.25 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.62 m | 4.4 ft1.35 m |
| Displacement | 1,170 lb531 kg | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 1,300 lb590 kg |
| Sail area | 300 ft²27.9 m² | 267 ft²24.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 43.23 | 20.54 |
| Displacement / Length | 52 | 155 |
| Comfort ratio | 6.0 | 13.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.66 | 2.22 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.1 |
Raven vs Seidelmann 245: the short version
- The Raven and Seidelmann 245 are close in length (24.3 ft7.39 m vs 24.2 ft7.37 m ).
- The Seidelmann 245 is heavier, displacing about 156% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Raven carries the more powerful rig (43.2 vs 20.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Seidelmann 245 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Seidelmann 245 rates better for offshore work (2.22 vs 2.66).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.