Reel 300 vs Reel Racer 340
How do the Reel 300 and Reel Racer 340 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Reel 300 | Reel 300 | Reel Racer 340 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.7 ft3.88 m | 12.8 ft3.89 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.6 ft0.80 m | 2.6 ft0.80 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 42 lb19 kg | 42 lb19 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 3.01 | 3.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Reel 300 vs Reel Racer 340: the short version
- The Reel 300 and Reel Racer 340 are close in length (12.7 ft3.88 m vs 12.8 ft3.89 m ).
- By the capsize screening formula the Reel Racer 340 rates better for offshore work (3.01 vs 3.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.