Rival 22 vs Swan 47
How do the Rival 22 and Swan 47 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Rival 22 | Rival 22 | Swan 47 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.3 ft11.07 m | 36.3 ft11.05 m |
| Waterline length | 27.1 ft8.25 m | 36.3 ft11.05 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 13.8 ft4.19 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.50 m | 7.6 ft2.33 m |
| Displacement | 5,732 lb2,600 kg | 32,408 lb14,700 kg |
| Ballast | 2,646 lb1,200 kg | 15,500 lb7,031 kg |
| Sail area | 452 ft²42.0 m² | 1,366 ft²126.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.58 | 21.50 |
| Displacement / Length | 129 | 304 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.6 | 42.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.79 | 1.73 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 8.1 |
| Average used price | €7,900 | — |
Rival 22 vs Swan 47: the short version
- The Rival 22 and Swan 47 are close in length (36.3 ft11.07 m vs 36.3 ft11.05 m ).
- The Swan 47 is heavier, displacing about 465% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Rival 22 carries the more powerful rig (22.6 vs 21.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 47 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 47 rates better for offshore work (1.73 vs 1.79).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.