Roue 20 vs Sprint 95
How do the Roue 20 and Sprint 95 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Roue 20 
Sprint 95 | Roue 20 | Sprint 95 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 31.0 ft9.45 m | 31.1 ft9.48 m |
| Waterline length | 21.0 ft6.40 m | 27.6 ft8.40 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 9.6 ft2.92 m |
| Draft | 4.2 ft1.28 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 4,700 lb2,132 kg | 4,950 lb2,245 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 1,764 lb800 kg |
| Sail area | 382 ft²35.5 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 21.78 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 227 | 106 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.0 | 13.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.91 | 2.25 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 7.0 |
Roue 20 vs Sprint 95: the short version
- The Roue 20 and Sprint 95 are close in length (31.0 ft9.45 m vs 31.1 ft9.48 m ).
- The Roue 20 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Roue 20 rates better for offshore work (1.91 vs 2.25).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.