RS Aero vs Spindrift 13
How do the RS Aero and Spindrift 13 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
RS Aero 
Spindrift 13 | RS Aero | Spindrift 13 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 13.2 ft4.01 m | 13.3 ft4.06 m |
| Waterline length | 13.2 ft4.01 m | —— |
| Beam | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 5.2 ft1.58 m |
| Draft | 1.0 ft0.30 m | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 66 lb30 kg | 205 lb93 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 5 ft²0.5 m² | 100 ft²9.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 4.90 | 46.02 |
| Displacement / Length | 13 | — |
| Comfort ratio | 1.0 | — |
| Capsize screening | 4.54 | 3.51 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 4.9 | — |
RS Aero vs Spindrift 13: the short version
- The RS Aero and Spindrift 13 are close in length (13.2 ft4.01 m vs 13.3 ft4.06 m ).
- The Spindrift 13 is heavier, displacing about 211% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Spindrift 13 carries the more powerful rig (46.0 vs 4.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Spindrift 13 rates better for offshore work (3.51 vs 4.54).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.