RS Aero vs Wave
How do the RS Aero and Wave compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
RS Aero 
Wave | RS Aero | Wave | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 13.2 ft4.01 m | 13.0 ft3.96 m |
| Waterline length | 13.2 ft4.01 m | 12.5 ft3.80 m |
| Beam | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 7.0 ft2.13 m |
| Draft | 1.0 ft0.30 m | 0.9 ft0.28 m |
| Displacement | 66 lb30 kg | 245 lb111 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 5 ft²0.5 m² | 95 ft²8.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 4.90 | 38.82 |
| Displacement / Length | 13 | 56 |
| Comfort ratio | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| Capsize screening | 4.54 | 4.47 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 4.9 | 4.7 |
RS Aero vs Wave: the short version
- The RS Aero and Wave are close in length (13.2 ft4.01 m vs 13.0 ft3.96 m ).
- The Wave is heavier, displacing about 271% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Wave carries the more powerful rig (38.8 vs 4.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Wave scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Wave rates better for offshore work (4.47 vs 4.54).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.