Sabre 28 vs TES 28 Magnam
How do the Sabre 28 and TES 28 Magnam compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Sabre 28 
TES 28 Magnam | Sabre 28 | TES 28 Magnam | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.0 ft8.53 m | 28.0 ft8.53 m |
| Waterline length | 22.8 ft6.96 m | 26.0 ft7.92 m |
| Beam | 9.2 ft2.80 m | 9.9 ft3.02 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.32 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 7,400 lb3,357 kg | 6,400 lb2,903 kg |
| Ballast | 2,900 lb1,315 kg | 1,980 lb898 kg |
| Sail area | 393 ft²36.5 m² | 380 ft²35.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.56 | 17.64 |
| Displacement / Length | 278 | 163 |
| Comfort ratio | 24.5 | 17.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.88 | 2.14 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.8 |
Sabre 28 vs TES 28 Magnam: the short version
- The Sabre 28 and TES 28 Magnam are close in length (28.0 ft8.53 m vs 28.0 ft8.53 m ).
- The Sabre 28 is heavier, displacing about 16% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the TES 28 Magnam carries the more powerful rig (17.6 vs 16.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Sabre 28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Sabre 28 rates better for offshore work (1.88 vs 2.14).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.