San Juan 33S vs Scanmar 33
How do the San Juan 33S and Scanmar 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
San Juan 33S | San Juan 33S | Scanmar 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.1 ft10.09 m | 33.1 ft10.10 m |
| Waterline length | 27.8 ft8.47 m | 27.2 ft8.30 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.42 m | 10.8 ft3.30 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 5.7 ft1.75 m |
| Displacement | 5,700 lb2,585 kg | 10,141 lb4,600 kg |
| Ballast | 3,500 lb1,588 kg | 4,189 lb1,900 kg |
| Sail area | 464 ft²43.1 m² | 678 ft²63.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 23.27 | 23.15 |
| Displacement / Length | 118 | 224 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.9 | 22.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.78 | 2.00 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.1 | 7.0 |
| Average used price | — | €29,000 |
San Juan 33S vs Scanmar 33: the short version
- The San Juan 33S and Scanmar 33 are close in length (33.1 ft10.09 m vs 33.1 ft10.10 m ).
- The Scanmar 33 is heavier, displacing about 78% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the San Juan 33S carries the more powerful rig (23.3 vs 23.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Scanmar 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the San Juan 33S rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 2.00).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.