Sandpiper 565 vs Typhoon 18
How do the Sandpiper 565 and Typhoon 18 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Sandpiper 565 
Typhoon 18 | Sandpiper 565 | Typhoon 18 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.5 ft5.64 m | 18.5 ft5.64 m |
| Waterline length | 15.0 ft4.57 m | 13.5 ft4.11 m |
| Beam | 7.1 ft2.16 m | 6.3 ft1.92 m |
| Draft | 2.9 ft0.88 m | 2.6 ft0.79 m |
| Displacement | 1,200 lb544 kg | 2,000 lb907 kg |
| Ballast | 300 lb136 kg | 900 lb408 kg |
| Sail area | 154 ft²14.3 m² | 155 ft²14.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.82 | 15.62 |
| Displacement / Length | 159 | 363 |
| Comfort ratio | 8.5 | 17.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.67 | 2.00 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.2 | 4.9 |
Sandpiper 565 vs Typhoon 18: the short version
- The Sandpiper 565 and Typhoon 18 are close in length (18.5 ft5.64 m vs 18.5 ft5.64 m ).
- The Typhoon 18 is heavier, displacing about 67% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Sandpiper 565 carries the more powerful rig (21.8 vs 15.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Typhoon 18 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Typhoon 18 rates better for offshore work (2.00 vs 2.67).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.