Sandpiper 565 vs Victoria 18
How do the Sandpiper 565 and Victoria 18 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Sandpiper 565 
Victoria 18 | Sandpiper 565 | Victoria 18 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.5 ft5.64 m | 18.5 ft5.64 m |
| Waterline length | 15.0 ft4.57 m | 12.8 ft3.91 m |
| Beam | 7.1 ft2.16 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Draft | 2.9 ft0.88 m | 2.0 ft0.61 m |
| Displacement | 1,200 lb544 kg | 1,200 lb544 kg |
| Ballast | 300 lb136 kg | 550 lb249 kg |
| Sail area | 154 ft²14.3 m² | 137 ft²12.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.82 | 19.41 |
| Displacement / Length | 159 | 254 |
| Comfort ratio | 8.5 | 13.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.67 | 2.07 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.2 | 4.8 |
Sandpiper 565 vs Victoria 18: the short version
- The Sandpiper 565 and Victoria 18 are close in length (18.5 ft5.64 m vs 18.5 ft5.64 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Sandpiper 565 carries the more powerful rig (21.8 vs 19.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Victoria 18 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Victoria 18 rates better for offshore work (2.07 vs 2.67).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.