Santana 20 vs Santana 30/30
How do the Santana 20 and Santana 30/30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Santana 20 
Santana 30/30 | Santana 20 | Santana 30/30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 20.3 ft6.17 m | 29.9 ft9.12 m |
| Waterline length | 16.0 ft4.88 m | 25.4 ft7.75 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 10.3 ft3.12 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 1,350 lb612 kg | 6,500 lb2,948 kg |
| Ballast | 550 lb249 kg | 2,310 lb1,048 kg |
| Sail area | 186 ft²17.3 m² | 440 ft²40.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.36 | 20.21 |
| Displacement / Length | 147 | 177 |
| Comfort ratio | 7.6 | 16.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.90 | 2.20 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 6.8 |
Santana 20 vs Santana 30/30: the short version
- The Santana 30/30 is the larger boat at 29.9 ft9.12 m LOA versus 20.3 ft6.17 m for the Santana 20.
- The Santana 30/30 is heavier, displacing about 381% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Santana 20 carries the more powerful rig (24.4 vs 20.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Santana 30/30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Santana 30/30 rates better for offshore work (2.20 vs 2.90).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.