Santana 39 vs Schock 23
How do the Santana 39 and Schock 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Santana 39 
Schock 23 | Santana 39 | Schock 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 39.0 ft11.89 m | 23.3 ft7.11 m |
| Waterline length | 32.0 ft9.75 m | 20.7 ft6.30 m |
| Beam | 11.7 ft3.56 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 5.6 ft1.70 m | 2.9 ft0.89 m |
| Displacement | 18,000 lb8,165 kg | 2,800 lb1,270 kg |
| Ballast | 6,600 lb2,994 kg | 1,100 lb499 kg |
| Sail area | 686 ft²63.7 m² | 267 ft²24.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.98 | 21.50 |
| Displacement / Length | 245 | 142 |
| Comfort ratio | 30.9 | 11.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.78 | 2.41 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.6 | 6.1 |
Santana 39 vs Schock 23: the short version
- The Santana 39 is the larger boat at 39.0 ft11.89 m LOA versus 23.3 ft7.11 m for the Schock 23.
- The Santana 39 is heavier, displacing about 543% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Schock 23 carries the more powerful rig (21.5 vs 16.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Santana 39 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Santana 39 rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 2.41).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.