Scampi 30 vs Shipman 28
How do the Scampi 30 and Shipman 28 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Scampi 30 
Shipman 28 | Scampi 30 | Shipman 28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.8 ft9.07 m | 29.1 ft8.86 m |
| Waterline length | 23.0 ft7.01 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Beam | 9.8 ft3.00 m | 8.5 ft2.60 m |
| Draft | 5.4 ft1.65 m | 5.1 ft1.55 m |
| Displacement | 7,275 lb3,300 kg | 6,173 lb2,800 kg |
| Ballast | 2,778 lb1,260 kg | 2,667 lb1,210 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 307 ft²28.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 14.60 |
| Displacement / Length | 267 | 298 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.4 | 23.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.03 | 1.86 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.1 |
| Average used price | €14,000 | €5,100 |
Scampi 30 vs Shipman 28: the short version
- The Scampi 30 is the larger boat at 29.8 ft9.07 m LOA versus 29.1 ft8.86 m for the Shipman 28.
- The Scampi 30 is heavier, displacing about 18% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Shipman 28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Shipman 28 rates better for offshore work (1.86 vs 2.03).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.