Scampi 30 vs Swan 36 Frers
How do the Scampi 30 and Swan 36 Frers compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Scampi 30 
Swan 36 Frers | Scampi 30 | Swan 36 Frers | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.8 ft9.07 m | 29.7 ft9.06 m |
| Waterline length | 23.0 ft7.01 m | 29.7 ft9.06 m |
| Beam | 9.8 ft3.00 m | 12.0 ft3.65 m |
| Draft | 5.4 ft1.65 m | 6.9 ft2.11 m |
| Displacement | 7,275 lb3,300 kg | 14,771 lb6,700 kg |
| Ballast | 2,778 lb1,260 kg | 5,600 lb2,540 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 624 ft²58.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 16.58 |
| Displacement / Length | 267 | 251 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.4 | 28.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.03 | 1.95 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 7.3 |
| Average used price | €14,000 | — |
Scampi 30 vs Swan 36 Frers: the short version
- The Scampi 30 and Swan 36 Frers are close in length (29.8 ft9.07 m vs 29.7 ft9.06 m ).
- The Swan 36 Frers is heavier, displacing about 103% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Swan 36 Frers scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 36 Frers rates better for offshore work (1.95 vs 2.03).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.