Scampi 30 vs Swan 371
How do the Scampi 30 and Swan 371 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Scampi 30 
Swan 371 | Scampi 30 | Swan 371 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.8 ft9.07 m | 29.7 ft9.06 m |
| Waterline length | 23.0 ft7.01 m | 29.7 ft9.06 m |
| Beam | 9.8 ft3.00 m | 11.3 ft3.46 m |
| Draft | 5.4 ft1.65 m | 6.8 ft2.07 m |
| Displacement | 7,275 lb3,300 kg | 16,100 lb7,303 kg |
| Ballast | 2,778 lb1,260 kg | 5,701 lb2,586 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 597 ft²55.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 14.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 267 | 274 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.4 | 32.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.03 | 1.80 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 7.3 |
| Average used price | €14,000 | — |
Scampi 30 vs Swan 371: the short version
- The Scampi 30 and Swan 371 are close in length (29.8 ft9.07 m vs 29.7 ft9.06 m ).
- The Swan 371 is heavier, displacing about 121% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Swan 371 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 371 rates better for offshore work (1.80 vs 2.03).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.