Scanmar 33 vs Tartan Ten
How do the Scanmar 33 and Tartan Ten compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Scanmar 33 
Tartan Ten | Scanmar 33 | Tartan Ten | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.1 ft10.10 m | 33.1 ft10.10 m |
| Waterline length | 27.2 ft8.30 m | 27.0 ft8.23 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.30 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 5.7 ft1.75 m | 5.8 ft1.78 m |
| Displacement | 10,141 lb4,600 kg | 7,100 lb3,221 kg |
| Ballast | 4,189 lb1,900 kg | 3,340 lb1,515 kg |
| Sail area | 678 ft²63.0 m² | 487 ft²45.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 23.15 | 21.09 |
| Displacement / Length | 224 | 161 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.6 | 19.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.00 | 1.93 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| Average used price | €29,000 | — |
Scanmar 33 vs Tartan Ten: the short version
- The Scanmar 33 and Tartan Ten are close in length (33.1 ft10.10 m vs 33.1 ft10.10 m ).
- The Scanmar 33 is heavier, displacing about 43% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Scanmar 33 carries the more powerful rig (23.2 vs 21.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Scanmar 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Tartan Ten rates better for offshore work (1.93 vs 2.00).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.