Seidelmann 37 vs Tayana 37
How do the Seidelmann 37 and Tayana 37 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Seidelmann 37 
Tayana 37 | Seidelmann 37 | Tayana 37 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.8 ft11.23 m | 36.7 ft11.18 m |
| Waterline length | 31.0 ft9.45 m | 31.0 ft9.45 m |
| Beam | 12.0 ft3.66 m | 11.6 ft3.54 m |
| Draft | 5.9 ft1.80 m | 5.7 ft1.73 m |
| Displacement | 12,000 lb5,443 kg | 22,500 lb10,206 kg |
| Ballast | 5,900 lb2,676 kg | 8,000 lb3,629 kg |
| Sail area | 643 ft²59.7 m² | 846 ft²78.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.63 | 16.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 180 | 337 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.7 | 40.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.10 | 1.64 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.5 | 7.5 |
Seidelmann 37 vs Tayana 37: the short version
- The Seidelmann 37 and Tayana 37 are close in length (36.8 ft11.23 m vs 36.7 ft11.18 m ).
- The Tayana 37 is heavier, displacing about 88% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Seidelmann 37 carries the more powerful rig (19.6 vs 17.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Tayana 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Tayana 37 rates better for offshore work (1.64 vs 2.10).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.