Singoalla 34 vs Tartan 33
How do the Singoalla 34 and Tartan 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Singoalla 34 
Tartan 33 | Singoalla 34 | Tartan 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.7 ft10.26 m | 33.7 ft10.26 m |
| Waterline length | 27.3 ft8.33 m | 28.8 ft8.79 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.30 m | 11.0 ft3.34 m |
| Draft | 5.2 ft1.58 m | 4.6 ft1.39 m |
| Displacement | 8,820 lb4,001 kg | 10,000 lb4,536 kg |
| Ballast | 3,750 lb1,701 kg | 4,400 lb1,996 kg |
| Sail area | 433 ft²40.2 m² | 531 ft²49.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.23 | 18.30 |
| Displacement / Length | 193 | 186 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.6 | 21.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.09 | 2.03 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 7.2 |
Singoalla 34 vs Tartan 33: the short version
- The Singoalla 34 and Tartan 33 are close in length (33.7 ft10.26 m vs 33.7 ft10.26 m ).
- The Tartan 33 is heavier, displacing about 13% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Tartan 33 carries the more powerful rig (18.3 vs 16.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Tartan 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Tartan 33 rates better for offshore work (2.03 vs 2.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.