Soling vs Stiletto 27
How do the Soling and Stiletto 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Soling 
Stiletto 27 | Soling | Stiletto 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.9 ft8.20 m | 26.8 ft8.18 m |
| Waterline length | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Beam | 6.2 ft1.90 m | 13.8 ft4.22 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 2,282 lb1,035 kg | 1,100 lb499 kg |
| Ballast | 1,257 lb570 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 739 ft²68.7 m² | 336 ft²31.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 68.22 | 50.45 |
| Displacement / Length | 127 | 36 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.0 | 2.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.89 | 5.36 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.6 |
Soling vs Stiletto 27: the short version
- The Soling and Stiletto 27 are close in length (26.9 ft8.20 m vs 26.8 ft8.18 m ).
- The Soling is heavier, displacing about 107% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Soling carries the more powerful rig (68.2 vs 50.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Soling scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Soling rates better for offshore work (1.89 vs 5.36).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.