Sonata 6.7 vs Tempest
How do the Sonata 6.7 and Tempest compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Sonata 6.7 .svg?width=960)
Tempest | Sonata 6.7 | Tempest | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.70 m | 22.0 ft6.70 m |
| Waterline length | 19.4 ft5.90 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.50 m | 6.5 ft1.97 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.50 m | 3.6 ft1.09 m |
| Displacement | 2,544 lb1,154 kg | 1,021 lb463 kg |
| Ballast | 952 lb432 kg | 440 lb200 kg |
| Sail area | 224 ft²20.8 m² | 247 ft²22.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.23 | 38.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 157 | 57 |
| Comfort ratio | 11.8 | 6.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.40 | 2.57 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 6.0 |
Sonata 6.7 vs Tempest: the short version
- The Sonata 6.7 and Tempest are close in length (22.0 ft6.70 m vs 22.0 ft6.70 m ).
- The Sonata 6.7 is heavier, displacing about 149% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Tempest carries the more powerful rig (39.0 vs 19.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Sonata 6.7 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Sonata 6.7 rates better for offshore work (2.40 vs 2.57).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.