Southern Cross 28 vs Southern Cross 35
How do the Southern Cross 28 and Southern Cross 35 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Southern Cross 28 | Southern Cross 28 | Southern Cross 35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.4 ft9.27 m | 35.3 ft10.74 m |
| Waterline length | 20.2 ft6.15 m | 28.0 ft8.53 m |
| Beam | 8.5 ft2.59 m | 11.4 ft3.48 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 8,500 lb3,856 kg | 17,700 lb8,029 kg |
| Ballast | 3,400 lb1,542 kg | 5,750 lb2,608 kg |
| Sail area | 415 ft²38.6 m² | 627 ft²58.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.94 | 14.77 |
| Displacement / Length | 462 | 360 |
| Comfort ratio | 32.7 | 35.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.67 | 1.75 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 7.1 |
Southern Cross 28 vs Southern Cross 35: the short version
- The Southern Cross 35 is the larger boat at 35.3 ft10.74 m LOA versus 30.4 ft9.27 m for the Southern Cross 28.
- The Southern Cross 35 is heavier, displacing about 108% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Southern Cross 28 carries the more powerful rig (15.9 vs 14.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Southern Cross 35 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Southern Cross 28 rates better for offshore work (1.67 vs 1.75).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.