Storfidra vs Watkins 25
How do the Storfidra and Watkins 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Storfidra | Storfidra | Watkins 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.9 ft7.60 m | 24.9 ft7.60 m |
| Waterline length | 20.7 ft6.30 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.40 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 4.2 ft1.29 m | 2.5 ft0.76 m |
| Displacement | 6,834 lb3,100 kg | 4,800 lb2,177 kg |
| Ballast | 2,866 lb1,300 kg | 1,900 lb862 kg |
| Sail area | 258 ft²24.0 m² | 261 ft²24.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 11.46 | 14.68 |
| Displacement / Length | 345 | 231 |
| Comfort ratio | 30.8 | 19.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.66 | 2.02 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Average used price | €2,200 | — |
Storfidra vs Watkins 25: the short version
- The Storfidra and Watkins 25 are close in length (24.9 ft7.60 m vs 24.9 ft7.60 m ).
- The Storfidra is heavier, displacing about 42% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Watkins 25 carries the more powerful rig (14.7 vs 11.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Storfidra scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Storfidra rates better for offshore work (1.66 vs 2.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.