Sun Odyssey 349 vs Swan 44
How do the Sun Odyssey 349 and Swan 44 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Sun Odyssey 349 
Swan 44 | Sun Odyssey 349 | Swan 44 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.9 ft10.34 m | 33.9 ft10.33 m |
| Waterline length | 30.8 ft9.40 m | 33.9 ft10.33 m |
| Beam | 11.3 ft3.44 m | 12.6 ft3.83 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 7.5 ft2.30 m |
| Displacement | 11,795 lb5,350 kg | 27,999 lb12,700 kg |
| Ballast | 3,483 lb1,580 kg | 12,600 lb5,715 kg |
| Sail area | 547 ft²50.8 m² | 930 ft²86.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.89 | 16.14 |
| Displacement / Length | 180 | 321 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.7 | 43.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.98 | 1.66 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.4 | 7.8 |
Sun Odyssey 349 vs Swan 44: the short version
- The Sun Odyssey 349 and Swan 44 are close in length (33.9 ft10.34 m vs 33.9 ft10.33 m ).
- The Swan 44 is heavier, displacing about 137% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Sun Odyssey 349 carries the more powerful rig (16.9 vs 16.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 44 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 44 rates better for offshore work (1.66 vs 1.98).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.