Swan 100 vs Swan 112 RS
How do the Swan 100 and Swan 112 RS compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 100 | Swan 100 | Swan 112 RS | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 86.8 ft26.46 m | 92.4 ft28.16 m |
| Waterline length | 86.8 ft26.46 m | 92.4 ft28.16 m |
| Beam | 23.2 ft7.06 m | 24.3 ft7.42 m |
| Draft | 13.2 ft4.02 m | 14.4 ft4.40 m |
| Displacement | 158,733 lb72,000 kg | 242,508 lb110,000 kg |
| Ballast | 63,934 lb29,000 kg | 61,729 lb28,000 kg |
| Sail area | 4,947 ft²459.6 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 27.00 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 108 | 137 |
| Comfort ratio | 43.1 | 57.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.71 | 1.56 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 12.5 | 12.9 |
Swan 100 vs Swan 112 RS: the short version
- The Swan 112 RS is the larger boat at 92.4 ft28.16 m LOA versus 86.8 ft26.46 m for the Swan 100.
- The Swan 112 RS is heavier, displacing about 53% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Swan 112 RS scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 112 RS rates better for offshore work (1.56 vs 1.71).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.