Swan 100 vs Swan 131
How do the Swan 100 and Swan 131 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 100 | Swan 100 | Swan 131 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 86.8 ft26.46 m | 114.7 ft34.96 m |
| Waterline length | 86.8 ft26.46 m | 114.7 ft34.96 m |
| Beam | 23.2 ft7.06 m | 27.9 ft8.50 m |
| Draft | 13.2 ft4.02 m | 15.4 ft4.70 m |
| Displacement | 158,733 lb72,000 kg | 396,832 lb180,000 kg |
| Ballast | 63,934 lb29,000 kg | 79,366 lb36,000 kg |
| Sail area | 4,947 ft²459.6 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 27.00 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 108 | 117 |
| Comfort ratio | 43.1 | 63.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.71 | 1.52 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 12.5 | 14.4 |
Swan 100 vs Swan 131: the short version
- The Swan 131 is the larger boat at 114.7 ft34.96 m LOA versus 86.8 ft26.46 m for the Swan 100.
- The Swan 131 is heavier, displacing about 150% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Swan 131 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 131 rates better for offshore work (1.52 vs 1.71).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.