Swan 112 RS vs Swan 115
How do the Swan 112 RS and Swan 115 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 112 RS | Swan 112 RS | Swan 115 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 92.4 ft28.16 m | 107.7 ft32.84 m |
| Waterline length | 92.4 ft28.16 m | 107.7 ft32.84 m |
| Beam | 24.3 ft7.42 m | 26.6 ft8.12 m |
| Draft | 14.4 ft4.40 m | 11.5 ft3.50 m |
| Displacement | 242,508 lb110,000 kg | 203,928 lb92,500 kg |
| Ballast | 61,729 lb28,000 kg | 70,547 lb32,000 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 7,025 ft²652.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 32.44 |
| Displacement / Length | 137 | 73 |
| Comfort ratio | 57.9 | 37.0 |
| Capsize screening | 1.56 | 1.81 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 12.9 | 13.9 |
Swan 112 RS vs Swan 115: the short version
- The Swan 115 is the larger boat at 107.7 ft32.84 m LOA versus 92.4 ft28.16 m for the Swan 112 RS.
- The Swan 112 RS is heavier, displacing about 19% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Swan 112 RS scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 112 RS rates better for offshore work (1.56 vs 1.81).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.