Swan 112 RS vs Swan 131
How do the Swan 112 RS and Swan 131 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 112 RS | Swan 112 RS | Swan 131 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 92.4 ft28.16 m | 114.7 ft34.96 m |
| Waterline length | 92.4 ft28.16 m | 114.7 ft34.96 m |
| Beam | 24.3 ft7.42 m | 27.9 ft8.50 m |
| Draft | 14.4 ft4.40 m | 15.4 ft4.70 m |
| Displacement | 242,508 lb110,000 kg | 396,832 lb180,000 kg |
| Ballast | 61,729 lb28,000 kg | 79,366 lb36,000 kg |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | 137 | 117 |
| Comfort ratio | 57.9 | 63.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.56 | 1.52 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 12.9 | 14.4 |
Swan 112 RS vs Swan 131: the short version
- The Swan 131 is the larger boat at 114.7 ft34.96 m LOA versus 92.4 ft28.16 m for the Swan 112 RS.
- The Swan 131 is heavier, displacing about 64% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Swan 131 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 131 rates better for offshore work (1.52 vs 1.56).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.