Swan 112 RS vs Swan 371
How do the Swan 112 RS and Swan 371 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 112 RS 
Swan 371 | Swan 112 RS | Swan 371 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 92.4 ft28.16 m | 29.7 ft9.06 m |
| Waterline length | 92.4 ft28.16 m | 29.7 ft9.06 m |
| Beam | 24.3 ft7.42 m | 11.3 ft3.46 m |
| Draft | 14.4 ft4.40 m | 6.8 ft2.07 m |
| Displacement | 242,508 lb110,000 kg | 16,100 lb7,303 kg |
| Ballast | 61,729 lb28,000 kg | 5,701 lb2,586 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 597 ft²55.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 14.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 137 | 274 |
| Comfort ratio | 57.9 | 32.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.56 | 1.80 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 12.9 | 7.3 |
Swan 112 RS vs Swan 371: the short version
- The Swan 112 RS is the larger boat at 92.4 ft28.16 m LOA versus 29.7 ft9.06 m for the Swan 371.
- The Swan 112 RS is heavier, displacing about 1406% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Swan 112 RS scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 112 RS rates better for offshore work (1.56 vs 1.80).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.