Swan 112 RS vs Swan 62
How do the Swan 112 RS and Swan 62 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 112 RS 
Swan 62 | Swan 112 RS | Swan 62 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 92.4 ft28.16 m | 52.2 ft15.90 m |
| Waterline length | 92.4 ft28.16 m | 52.2 ft15.90 m |
| Beam | 24.3 ft7.42 m | 17.5 ft5.34 m |
| Draft | 14.4 ft4.40 m | 9.8 ft3.00 m |
| Displacement | 242,508 lb110,000 kg | 62,832 lb28,500 kg |
| Ballast | 61,729 lb28,000 kg | 24,692 lb11,200 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 2,392 ft²222.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 24.22 |
| Displacement / Length | 137 | 198 |
| Comfort ratio | 57.9 | 41.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.56 | 1.76 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 12.9 | 9.7 |
Swan 112 RS vs Swan 62: the short version
- The Swan 112 RS is the larger boat at 92.4 ft28.16 m LOA versus 52.2 ft15.90 m for the Swan 62.
- The Swan 112 RS is heavier, displacing about 286% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Swan 112 RS scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 112 RS rates better for offshore work (1.56 vs 1.76).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.