Swan 36 Frers vs Swan 44 Frers
How do the Swan 36 Frers and Swan 44 Frers compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 36 Frers 
Swan 44 Frers | Swan 36 Frers | Swan 44 Frers | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.7 ft9.06 m | 45.1 ft13.75 m |
| Waterline length | 29.7 ft9.06 m | 34.6 ft10.56 m |
| Beam | 12.0 ft3.65 m | 13.7 ft4.18 m |
| Draft | 6.9 ft2.11 m | 7.2 ft2.20 m |
| Displacement | 14,771 lb6,700 kg | 24,251 lb11,000 kg |
| Ballast | 5,600 lb2,540 kg | 7,700 lb3,493 kg |
| Sail area | 624 ft²58.0 m² | 890 ft²82.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.58 | 17.00 |
| Displacement / Length | 251 | 260 |
| Comfort ratio | 28.1 | 30.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.95 | 1.89 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.3 | 7.9 |
Swan 36 Frers vs Swan 44 Frers: the short version
- The Swan 44 Frers is the larger boat at 45.1 ft13.75 m LOA versus 29.7 ft9.06 m for the Swan 36 Frers.
- The Swan 44 Frers is heavier, displacing about 64% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 44 Frers carries the more powerful rig (17.0 vs 16.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 44 Frers scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 44 Frers rates better for offshore work (1.89 vs 1.95).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.