Swan 36 Frers vs Swan 60
How do the Swan 36 Frers and Swan 60 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 36 Frers 
Swan 60 | Swan 36 Frers | Swan 60 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.7 ft9.06 m | 50.7 ft15.45 m |
| Waterline length | 29.7 ft9.06 m | 50.7 ft15.45 m |
| Beam | 12.0 ft3.65 m | 17.6 ft5.35 m |
| Draft | 6.9 ft2.11 m | 11.4 ft3.47 m |
| Displacement | 14,771 lb6,700 kg | 51,809 lb23,500 kg |
| Ballast | 5,600 lb2,540 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 624 ft²58.0 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 16.58 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 251 | 178 |
| Comfort ratio | 28.1 | 34.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.95 | 1.88 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.3 | 9.5 |
Swan 36 Frers vs Swan 60: the short version
- The Swan 60 is the larger boat at 50.7 ft15.45 m LOA versus 29.7 ft9.06 m for the Swan 36 Frers.
- The Swan 60 is heavier, displacing about 251% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Swan 60 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 60 rates better for offshore work (1.88 vs 1.95).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.